A very quick graph plotting the proportion (percentage, %) of laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease (EVD) cases reported by the WHO over time. That is, the of samples taken from clinically suspected EVD cases that are RT-PCR positive for Ebola virus in a given report, divided by the total number of suspected + probable + confirmed cases in that report.
Looking at the graph below, it seems like a lower proportion of total cases are being confirmed now compared to before the total case load began decreasing (especially from December onwards-see adjacent graphic).
Presumably this is due to the larger number of other infectious diseases in the region that cause signs and symptoms, especially early signs and symptoms, that cannot be easily clinically differentiated from EVD; more suspect cases that don't test positive for EVD than before.
When considered in the context of the now smaller number of EVD cases overall, the non-EVD infection's background "noise" has become louder.
But the bottom line is that EVD cases are steadily declining thanks to the many efforts of many people and the changes to habits, traditions and practices that increased risky contact.
![]() |
| Taken from my static EVD tallies and graphs page here. Updated 28JAN2015 AEST.Click on graph to enlarge. |
Presumably this is due to the larger number of other infectious diseases in the region that cause signs and symptoms, especially early signs and symptoms, that cannot be easily clinically differentiated from EVD; more suspect cases that don't test positive for EVD than before.
When considered in the context of the now smaller number of EVD cases overall, the non-EVD infection's background "noise" has become louder.
But the bottom line is that EVD cases are steadily declining thanks to the many efforts of many people and the changes to habits, traditions and practices that increased risky contact.

