Medical News Blog Information

The Navajo Experience with Tuberculosis

Contrary to popular belief, although �Native� Americans populated the Americas long before Europeans and other immigrants, Native American history is also one of immigration and migration throughout the North American and South American continents.

Over 1000 years ago, the Athabascans crossed the Bering Sea from the Eurasian landmass and settled parts of Western Canada and Alaska. Through cultural, linguistic, and genetic research, it was recently discovered that the Navajo are descended from the Athabascans and most likely branched off in the 1300-1400s when they migrated to the American Southwest. Other Athabascans diverged and became present-day Apaches.

Traditionally hunter-gatherers, the Navajo learned from neighboring Pueblo tribes how to farm and cultivate the land. Over time, they fended off threats from the Spanish but eventually were defeated by US forces including Colonel Christopher �Kit� Carson in the mid 1860s. This defeat culminated in the widespread deportation of Navajo people away from their homelands to Ft Sumner from 1864-1866 that came to be known as the �Long Walk� and the signing of treaties that led to the formation of Navajo Nation. It is purported that this was one of the first exposures of the Navajo people to tuberculosis. By 1912, 10% of Navajo had TB, and TB was responsible for 50% of all illness seen among the Navajo.

The Navajo word for TB is �jei di,� which literally means �disappearing heart.� There is a commonly held perception that TB can be caused by contact with wood that has been struck by lightning. Navajo Medicine asserts that TB or jei di can be cured by the shooting way ceremony to achieve harmony.

By 1953, almost a century after the �Long Walk", TB incidence was 100x higher among the Navajo than among the general US population. Around this time, a brave lady named Annie Wauneka led a public health campaign to educate her fellow Navajo about the dangers of TB and to correct misconceptions surrounding the disease. She taught Navajo medicine men about TB, pioneered a model of directly-observed therapy for TB, and encouraged Navajo to complete their TB treatment.

Today, tuberculosis still plagues the Dine at a rate many times that of the general US population. As you may know, tuberculosis is a curious disease in its ability to remain latent for many years before reactivating during times of sickness or immunosuppression. TB is called the �Second great imitator� due to its protein manifestations. 

It is estimated that as many as 1/3 of all those who suffer from diabetes mellitus on the reservation have latent tuberculosis and are at risk for reactivation and transmission. As such, it is increasingly common for all those with DM to be screened for latent TB with a PPD or a serum quantiferon test.

Although TB rates and mortality have fallen drastically thanks to efforts by Annie Wauneka and others, TB is still a disturbingly common occurrence among the Navajo. While working with an infectious disease physician in Navajo Nation, I had the opportunity to meet and care for a kind lady on immunosuppressants for her rheumatoid arthritis who presented with severe hip pain. Although the thought was that she likely had a labral tear or her pain was a manifestation of her pre-existing RA, her joint was tapped and was positive for TB. She was treated with a 4 drug regimen, and before I left her pain had significantly improved. 

For context for those reading, during my 6 year general medical training in the United States, although tuberculosis has been on the differential many times, I have never cared for a patient with newly diagnosed tuberculosis. I have read and seen patients with TB in India and southern Mexico but not once in the United States. By and large, it is a disease of poverty and affects the most vulnerable both from a medical and societal perspective.


In my next post, I hope to speak more about structural factors that affect health in Navajo Nation.

Liberia gave Ebola the boot...and a virus may soon be removed from the wild

The people of Liberia have earned our respect, some time for national celebrations and frankly any other rewards that may flow from denying the Makona variant of Ebola virus any hosts among their community. 

The world considered this viral species to be one of the list-toppers when it came to ranking the causes of the most scary acute infectious diseases. Ebola virus has been the basis for all sorts of 'end-of 'the-world' mutating virus horror movies, books, and TV shows. It's not at all surprising that the public view of an Ebola virus infection had long been one of blood, fear and terror.

Figure 1. The decline of the Makona variant of
Ebola virus in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia
(now free of EVD transmission).
Click on image to enlarge.
Behavioural change was a major factor in reducing virus transmission in Liberia. Alongside that was a broad range of aid given from within and beyond Africa's nations. By working together, a widespread outbreak that was not initially thought likely to happen at all, was routed. 

For now. 

Liberia is not immune to new cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) crossing its borders or popping up due to a new animal-to-human jump (a zoonosis). That could happen any day - it might be happening now. But those who are still on watch will be searching out new cases while the remaining sites of transmission - Guinea and Liberia - do their best to deny Ebola virus a chance to replicate and spread. The people of Liberia will keep watch help because they have learned very tough lessons about viruses, epidemiology and communication. At least 10,604 suspect, probable and confirmed EVD cases, 4,769 deaths and way too many stories of sadness and families destroyed are a very strict teacher. 

Figure 2. The number of confirmed EVD
cases (yellow) grinds to a standstill. Only
9 cases in the week to 10th May 2015.
Click on image to enlarge.
The crude prediction in Figure 1 suggests that zero cases across all three countries could happen at the end of May, but many stars must align for that to be a real event. 

Human factors - the causal and sustaining variables of any outbreak of infectious disease in humans and sometimes animals - remain very much in play. But once that tri-country zero case value is attained, we have 42 days of watching and waiting - from the time the final case tests negative. 

New cases may arise from sources as-yet-unknown. But even if they do keep popping up, it seems very unlikely that widespread transmission will amplify to earlier levels (see the steep slopes in Figure 2) unless a major lapse in attention occurs. Hence,the need for continued vigilance - and Liberia remains on alert for a further 90 days. That more recent figure comes about because we know that infectious Ebola virus can persist in some body sites for many weeks after signs of disease have passed. Whether that virus reservoir is present in every person and whether it actually does cause new Ebola virus infections remain unproven. When you consider what can happen when one person gets infected by an Ebola virus in a tiny remote village in a country that is ill prepared to cope with it and has traditions that lend themselves to its spread...even minor risks rightly come under more intense scrutiny.

What next for this particular virus though? The only place where the Makona variant of this member of the Zaire ebolavirus species will soon exist, is in the freezer of (hopefully) very biosecure laboratories in the US, UK, Africa, Russia, China and probably other laboratories in countries that hosted, evacuated or repatriated cases of EVD. 

There is no sign at all - and this is because of the continued efforts and focus of many currently working throughout west Africa - of the fabled "endemic Ebola" becoming a reality. Unless you mean enzootic 'Ebola'- in which case , it already is, I suspect. It seems very, very likely that the forests of west Africa continue to shelter animal hosts with less mutated versions of this and other ebolaviruses (and filoviruses and who-knows-what else). The host species and route(s) of transmission to humans are yet to be confirmed but for now, we are not too far off eradicating one unwanted viral scourge from the wild. Impressive what we can do when we pull together.

Outbreak resources: more expert detail presented simply, to more people, at a trusted site, quickly, and for free...

Many, many of us have learned a lot about Ebola virus and Ebola virus disease (EVD) over the past 61 weeks - some more than others. 

Some have paid very dearly for their new knowledge and some few have leveraged the event to try and make a buck or draw more attention to themselves or their trade.

Many have been scared - few outside Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia have had a real need to be - but fear of this tiny killer is understandable. I stand by my comments on that from back in August when the United States woke up to what had been happening in west Africa for five months, and promptly started freaking out...without evidence of any widespread threat or danger.


Not everyone has a library on everything
For all of the unwanted, unnecessary and often inflammatory commentary, hypotheses, guesses and conspiracy theories, there was some good information to be found about EVD. Sometimes it was only able to be found by academics or others with access to journals that sit behind fee-for-view virtual walls (paywalls). Sometimes the science was too dense for the public to follow - even when they could access it. But most of the time it just took far more digging to unearth the basics than it should have. It would have been good if more of those who could access and interpret that information, had proactively done so.

EVD in west Africa helped generate a lot of publicly accessible descriptive information about some of the technical language of infectious disease outbreaks. But there could be more. New information for public consumption should be...

  • Clear, simple information that can be easily read and shared using today's short, punchy and graphic-laden social media communication tools
  • Information that is quick and easily found or can be found using (way more) friendly search engines. A page of 2,000+ poorly descriptive results returned from a keyword search...is not helpful
  • Broad descriptions about broad topics - not just narrow descriptions for one aspect of one outbreak caused by one virus. We need to explain the wider patterns that are shared among many outbreaks and by many viruses. Ebola virus is not the first bloodborne virus, not the first sexually transmitted virus, not the first virus to spread in vomit and faces or by droplets, or to survive on surfaces, or to mutate, or to have an RNA genome, or to be detected by RT-PCR, or to have its genome sequenced, or to be the trigger for contact tracing, or to have just appeared in west Africa in 2014...etc. Start tying these patterns together to give the public a better sense of what we live with every day, instead of responding to the now and the scary.
  • A single online, well formatted (for multiple devices) site that hosts all this information provided, checked, updated and agreed upon by experts in the fields, written by communicators and hosted by the new and improved World Health Organization (WHO). The world needs a one-stop outbreak info shop that it can rely on. And that shop should be staffed by assistants who are available to answer questions or direct customers to the aisles best suited to their needs. We expect access to information and answers to questions from our phone company, so why not from our World's health experts?
  • Using better citation to acknowledge the reference material in public health information - what is so wrong with letting everyone know what the guidelines are guided by? Anecdotal is not enough.
  • Date stamped to make it clear when it was written and when it was updated. Am I looking at contemporary thinking - or something from 2 days ago before that major discovery/event changed everything we knew about virus X? 
Many public health entities already create pages upon pages of information on each outbreak but some of that is written for people who like to read...a lot...and is in a style that is sometimes too dense and dry with words and phrases that are not well defined. A glossary might also be of use. 

There will always be a portion of the public who seek their news and detail from the loudest and most garish 'news' source. There are also many who would like to be the smartest person at water cooler - but not if that comes at the expense of trying to locate and then wade through reams of technical guff. 


More expert detail, simply presented, to more people, from a trusted site, quickly and for free.

The next 'Ebola' might have a much harder time getting traction in a territory if its population is ready for it, or can get up to speed quickly.

Like Us

Blog Archive