Click on image to enlarge. |
Today's case details (not yet on the English MOH site) with FluTracker's case numbering included (as it will be in all my posts from now on) are mostly female (yesterdays seemed to be all male), all in stable condition and they seem to be Riyadh-centric:
- FT129: 51-year old female (51F), symptomatic female, contact of a mystery case, Riyadh
- FT130: 47F, symptomatic healthcare worker (HCW), Riyadh
- FT131: 39F, symptomatic HCW, Riyadh
- FT132: 38M, symptomatic HCW, Riyadh
The average age for cases is now sitting at 50-years and the median ages are 39 and 56.
For fatal cases the average age is 59 and the mode sits at 56.
These represent a reduction in age reflecting the relatively younger cases of late. The younger, predominantly contact-based cases seem to have fewer underlying conditions as a rule - or at least we're hearing of fewer.
So, generalising, severe MERS continues to be an outcome among the older group with comorbidities and less so among contacts and the younger age band.
So, as I like to waste my time asking, I wonder what would happen if prospective testing were to be conducted on a sample of the general population, say in Riyadh, Medinah and Hafr Al Batin, without regard for symptoms? Ideally also in a "control" city from which no cases have been reported.
My hypothesis is that the average age of MERS cases would drop further and the PFC along with it. In other words there would be more asymptomatic and mild cases detected than we see now. That would really serve the needs of pilgrims and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Maybe such studies are happening right now - who'd know?
My hypothesis is that the average age of MERS cases would drop further and the PFC along with it. In other words there would be more asymptomatic and mild cases detected than we see now. That would really serve the needs of pilgrims and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Maybe such studies are happening right now - who'd know?